Breath of the wild and red dead redemption 2.
The legend of zelda breath of the wild vs red dead redemption 2. Rdr2 1 z botw 1. Take the legend of zelda. Yes breath of the wild came out 20 months before red dead 2 but that game was a four year project whereas red dead 2 was in production for at least seven years so there s four years of parallel. It raises the bar moving forward on just about everything in terms of graphics from lighting effects to environment details and facial textures.
You just follow the yellow or red gps trail. So you wind up with one world that is a joy to. This makes it fun to just mess around compared to grinding animals for rare skins in rdr2. I don t mean bad intentions they didn t care about the graphics.
3 zelda has a huge variety of combat different bosses and enemies with different tactics. But zelda botw was made with love. This makes zelda feel more like a real place for me. 2 zelda has a huge variety of emergent gameplay from lightning baiting to fire rolling.
Red dead redemption 2 sets a new standard for realism in video games and may just be the best looking game ever made. Just an old worn map and a compass that you should pull out of your pockets manually. From the road side cries for help to the deep opportunities for getting to know strangers rdr2 is much better about making the world feel lived in. Two wildly different games in most respects but in some ways they ve incorporated very similar ideas into their respective.
Zelda breath of the wild is better then red dead redemption yeah rdr2 has better graphics story. Rdr2 should not even have a navigation system. Each one of the main missions in rdr2 tells a pretty singular coherent and exciting story. I can t even fathom how someone would think this.
Breath of the wild. Maybe you like the subject of botw story better and thats fine but in no way is it as fleshed out as the story in rdr2.